It's been almost 72 years since India became independent and
all the while the
general public suffered from one basic aspect and that was The old age
pension system and a social security system.
Traditionally up to 1991 the earning populace was so used to putting
their money in FD and RD at 12% that it never really mattered for them to look
anywhere beyond NSC or other post office schemes and of course the omnipresent LIC.
Last
was the Ocean into
which the public was throwing away its money which spoiled the investment culture so badly that
people would rush to them for princely returns of 5% over 20 years and more.
Just
like the story about frog who was put into a pot of water and slowly it was
heated; in a similar way the government kept reducing
the interest rates on all small savings PPF and fds and to add insult to injury
also introduced TDS on the fixed deposits.
Around this time something deceivingly spectacular made its
way into the Indian market and it was called ULIP.
ULIP
came riding piggyback on the mutual funds which had already made an entry about
eight years before.
Mutual Funds were not so aggressively sold so less than 1% of the
investing public invested their hard earned
money in them.But the ULIPs were being sold heavily at mind boggling commissions and hence were thrust
down the throat of the higher income group.
Slowly few people caught on to the mutual funds and started
making money with the return in excess of 15% on rolling basis.with this kind
of return the people did not even mind losing the money to Ulips as they had tasted blood.
It seems very automatic to them that putting money in mutual
funds was a sure shot way of gaining minimum 15% next year unless of course Y2K
and 2008 happened.
The Dotcom
bust in year 2000 and
the global subprime crisis of 2008 pulled away a lot of people from the equity
market.
Around the same time in 2009 NPS was introduced after being tried out for Govt employees in 2004.
It was supposed to be a path breaking plan backed by government of India and
controlled by PFRDA.
NPS was supposed to be sold on the back of infinitesimally
low expense charges , in
fact fraction of what Mutual Funds were charging but having the same 8 fund houses as the fund
managers.
The
mechanics of NPS is a
little complicated. You have
3 streams or asset classes
to allocate your money to viz Equity, Government bonds and Corporate bonds. As a
conservative gesture the government did not initially
allow more than 50% allocation to equity (now it is max 75%). After a lock in upto the age
person could take out 60% of the Corpus on his 60th birthday but 40% minimum
would be allocated to buy annuity from insurance company . Annuity in simple language
meant that 40% of the Corpus would be given to the insurance company of your
choice who will continue to give you a monthly pension at a fixed rate which
was not very high until subscriber’s death. At the time of death the pension could be continued for the nominee
or the annuity sum would be returned to the nominee.
What
was important was that
NPS was opened not only to the organised sector but a it also replaced the government pension
scheme and was open to
anyone who wished to
open NPS account.
The next 10 years brought in a lot of changes and another
asset class was added as Alternative Investments or AI. 40% of the Corpus which a person withdrew
was made tax free and the lock in period or the period till which a person
could defer its annuity was extended upto 70 years of age.
As
things stand today there are 8-9
fund managers and NPS operates in Tier 1 and Tier 2 mode.
Tier 1 mode is compulsory with a minimum of 1000 rupees
subscription and can be used for tax saving under 80C up to a sum of rupees 2 lacs. The lock in up to
60 years of age is in Tier 1
only.
Tier 2 also operates exactly like Tier 1 except that there is no lock-in and you can distribute your money into various asset classes.It
is important to note that as soon as the funds appear in Tier 2 you can
withdraw them anytime at a short notice.
The Unpopularity:
the Indian middle class who had tasted the returns of mutual funds had become used to the instant
liquidity nature of various types of funds.
Some of them preferred MFs over FDs also which is a very good thing.
The
main thing which was pulling away the Indian public and even those who did not
have any retiral benefits for gratuity and pension were not in a mood to keep their money locked in
for such a long time till the age of 60.
This is precisely why I have written this article.
I am a self made mutual fund investor who started with the
first mutual fund introduced in India. I have made my portfolio in due course of time but I would say
one thing at this stage that,
if something like NPS
was available to me and everybody 30 years ago then probably Mutual Funds may
not have been so popular.
In addition to the lock in the people refuse to believe in anything which is backed by
the government or is sovereign in nature. This mistrust comes on the back of
the famous US 64
debacle , through which
the government royally cheated the investors.
Having considered both our aspect what I also feel is that
with the popularity of the equity market and mutual funds people have lost the
concept of pension.
It is a mindset which makes them feel that they can take
care of their own Investments.
While this is a healthy thinking but if it is not backed by
adequate qualification or determination and discipline it could actually prove to be undoing.
Most of the investors whom I know have invested or started
investing in the last 10 to 15 years. In these years also they're on the
constant look out for a good and a better fund hence exiting and entering
various funds every year. This mindset does not give constancy and in certain
cases people exit at a low and enter at a high. They confuse mutual fund
investing with direct equity investing and carry the same mindset here.
This I refer to as the marshmallow syndrome.
Most of the investors are in such a bad habit of looking at
the returns every week or every month that they cannot digest a little
fluctuation in their NAVs.
If the downturn in the market continues for a few months in
a year then they are quick to exit instead of investing more. NPS dissuades a person from this.
However
much we talk about long term investing and compounding, the investor can never
take a look beyond 5 years. The slow and boring process of compounding can
produce spectacular returns is something that a person refuses to acknowledge
or even consider.
Considering the NPS as the investment and security avenues I feel that Tier1
should be made as an investment and also a tax saving Avenue and a small amount
of money can also be deposited in the Tier 2.
Tier 2 is exactly like normal Mutual Funds but at a much
lower cost than the index funds or the ETFs. The taxation is also of the same
level.
Due to low expenses The returns as seen in the last 5 years
have been a little higher than the mutual funds in both equity and debt
segment.
So what is keeping the Indian citizen away from an excellent
pension scheme which has almost equivalent allocation as a equity hybrid fund.
As I have mentioned the first detractor is the lockin
which can be for almost 35 years for a youngster who is barely 25.
The second aspect is the annuity which is actually
controlled by the insurance companies as PFRDA does not have a system of managing it on its own.
Strategy for the self-employed or those in the Merchant
Navy: NPS provides a much simpler way of managing your savings and
channeling them on a long term basis into a relatively secure system.
in my opinion one must open NPS account as soon as one
starts working and should start investing smaller amounts equivalent to at
least 15 days of salary. The option must be kept with maximum equity allocation
which is 75% at present 15% Government bonds and 10% corporate bonds.
As one grows in age one will be able to see the consistent
rise in the Corpus and if encouraged by that one can keep increasing the
allocation to Tier 1.
Along
with this one can experiment by putting smaller amounts in Tier 2 which one
will be able to withdraw as and when one needs it.
As one approaches the retirement age that is from 55 onwards
one should increase the allocation into Tier 1.
5 years of increased allocation will boost the overall
courses on the back of the returns that one sees over extended period of time.
In my opinion it is the very lock in nature of one's money
which will give it the necessary boost even if it is against one's liking.
Since NPS also serves the central and State Government
employees it is my feeling that it will never be allowed to be diluted and The
returns that one sees will be greatly enhanced.
I cannot see for sure but as a speculation I feel that a
part of the annuity could also be made tax free in future.
Hence as the government sector gains on the back of various
improvements in NPS the common man should not be left behind.
2018 has seen the large cap return dwindle in the actively
managed MF but higher in the index funds or ETFs.
By extrapolating this hypothesis I can say that in future
the actively managed funds will continue to generate lower and lower Returns
but before the exchange traded funds or index funds beat the actively managed
funds , NPS would have
beaten them fairly and squarely.
CONCLUSION: I am a fervent supporter of mutual funds and the basis of my propagation of Financial literacy rests on the versatility of Mutual Funds.
Mutual funds are beyond doubt very flexible when it comes to selection and allocation of funds. But one aspect that they severely suffer from is the ability to be purchased because of 47 Fund houses and each having at least 200 odd variety to pick from. Add to this the severe shortage of good advisors and distributors who can advise going beyond personal benefits.
NPS gives a secular platform to the Lowest Common Denominator to start investing his money in a fairly diversified manner, all the while knowing how much he is generating as returns from each asset class.
He has just 8 Fund Managers to chose from and hence choice is simpler even if he has to change the fund manager every year, which comes at a very small cost.
Apart from allocating funds to the NPS Tier 1 and 2, one can for comparison purposes invest in 1 Hybrid Equity fund and 1 Multi Cap fund.
After a few years of sustained investing, he will be able to decide for himself which is the best course for him.